Skip to main content

The Riemann Hypothesis as a Stability Principle

  The Riemann Hypothesis can be reformulated as an infinite sequence of explicit positivity tests. This is not a proof. It turns a statement about complex zeros into inequalities that can be calculated, falsified at finite order, and compared with operator or physical models.   The completed zeta function is $$\xi(s)=\frac12s(s-1)\pi^{-s/2}\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta(s),$$ with $$\Xi(t)=\xi\left(\frac12+it\right).$$ The function $\Xi$ is even and real on the real axis. A nontrivial zero $\rho=\beta+i\gamma$ corresponds to $$t_\rho=\gamma-i\left(\beta-\frac12\right).$$ Therefore $$t_\rho\in\mathbb R \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \beta=\frac12,$$ and hence $$\boxed{\mathrm{RH}\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad\text{every zero of }\Xi\text{ is real}.}$$ Folding the Zeros Because $\Xi$ is even, write $$\Xi(t)=\sum_{n\ge0}c_nt^{2n}.$$ Now define $$G(z)=\frac{\Xi(i\sqrt z)}{\Xi(0)}.$$ Although this contains $\sqrt z$, the even expansion makes $G$ entire: $$G(z)=...
Post a Comment

Is ΛCDM Holographic?

 $\Lambda$CDM and Holographic Dark Energy

Generated image 

Holographic dark energy (HDE) starts from a simple thought: the energy inside a region of size $L$ shouldn't exceed that of a black hole of the same size.  

1. Definition and Basic Geometry

Event-horizon holographic dark energy is defined by

$$\rho_{\rm de}=3M_p^2\frac{c(a)^2}{L(a)^2},$$

where $c(a)>0$ is dimensionless and

$$L(a)=a\int_a^\infty\frac{da'}{a'^2H(a')}$$

is the future event horizon. Li's original 2004 model takes $c$ to be constant. Define

$$\Omega_{\rm de}=\frac{\rho_{\rm de}}{3M_p^2H^2}.$$

Then

$$\boxed{HL=\frac{c}{\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm de}}}}.$$

Differentiating the horizon definition gives

$$\boxed{\dot L=HL-1}.$$

Primes below denote $d/d\ln a$.

2. General Equation of State

For separately conserved dark energy,

$$\rho_{\rm de}'+3(1+w_{\rm de})\rho_{\rm de}=0.$$

Because $\rho_{\rm de}\propto c^2L^{-2}$,

$$\frac{\rho_{\rm de}'}{\rho_{\rm de}} =2\frac{c'}c-2\frac{L'}L.$$

The horizon identity gives

$$\frac{L'}L=1-\frac1{HL} =1-\frac{\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm de}}}{c}.$$

Therefore

$$\boxed{ w_{\rm de} =-\frac13-\frac{2\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm de}}}{3c} -\frac{2c'}{3c} }$$

or equivalently

$$\boxed{ c'=-\frac{1+3w_{\rm de}}2,c-\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm de}} }.$$

This is an identity following from the HDE definition, the event horizon and energy conservation.

3. What Goes Wrong When $c$ Is Constant

For $c'=0$,

$$w_{\rm de} =-\frac13-\frac{2\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm de}}}{3c}.$$

Taking $c=1$ and $\Omega_{{\rm de},0}=0.6889$ gives

$$w_0=-0.8867.$$

This compares badly to the cosmological-constant value $w=-1$!

For constant $c<1$, the HDE component first becomes phantom when

$$\boxed{\Omega_{\rm de}=c^2}.$$

Later, the total cosmic fluid reaches $\rho+p=0$, equivalently a minimum of $H$, when

$$\boxed{ 3-\Omega_{\rm de} -\frac{2\Omega_{\rm de}^{3/2}}c=0 }.$$

The minimum itself saturates the null energy condition. Beyond it, $\rho+p<0$, $H$ grows, $L$ contracts and the universe reaches a Big Rip in finite proper time.

4. Exact Reconstruction of $\Lambda$CDM

For a cosmological constant,

$$\rho_\Lambda=3M_p^2H_\Lambda^2, \qquad H_\Lambda^2=\frac{\Lambda}{3}.$$

Equating this with the HDE density requires

$$\boxed{ c(a)=H_\Lambda L(a) =H(a)L(a)\sqrt{\Omega_\Lambda(a)} }.$$

Differentiating gives

$$c' =H_\Lambda\frac{\dot L}{H} =H_\Lambda L-\frac{H_\Lambda}{H},$$

so

$$\boxed{c'=c-\sqrt{\Omega_\Lambda}}.$$

Substitution into the general equation of state gives

$$w_\Lambda =-\frac13-\frac{2\sqrt{\Omega_\Lambda}}{3c} -\frac{2}{3c}\left(c-\sqrt{\Omega_\Lambda}\right) =\boxed{-1}.$$

Thus flat $\Lambda$CDM has an exact event-horizon HDE representation. For $\Omega_{\Lambda0}=0.6889$, direct numerical integration gives

$$c_0=0.952258, \qquad c_0^2=0.906796,$$

and reproduces $w=-1$ to numerical precision. The trajectory begins with $c\to0$ during matter domination and approaches $c\to1$ in the de Sitter future.

5. The Entropy Corridor

Assign the horizon-area entropy

$$S(R)=\frac{\pi R^2}{G}.$$

Define

$$S_H=\frac{\pi}{GH^2}, \qquad S_e=\frac{\pi L^2}{G}, \qquad S_{\rm dS}=\frac{\pi}{GH_\Lambda^2}.$$

For reconstructed $\Lambda$CDM,

$$\boxed{ \frac{S_H}{S_{\rm dS}}=\Omega_\Lambda, \qquad \frac{S_e}{S_{\rm dS}}=c^2 }.$$

A nondecreasing event horizon requires

$$\dot L\ge0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad HL\ge1 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad c^2\ge\Omega_{\rm de}.$$

The requirement that dark energy inside $L$ not exceed the mass of a same-radius black hole gives

$$c^2\le1.$$

Hence, for the reconstructed $\Lambda$CDM trajectory,

$$\boxed{ S_H\le S_e\le S_{\rm dS} \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \Omega_\Lambda\le c^2\le1 }.$$

This is the entropy corridor. More generally, the geometric conditions are $HL\ge1$ and $c^2\le1$; the normalization by $S_{\rm dS}$ requires a specified asymptotic de Sitter scale.

6. No-Go Result for Non-de Sitter Endpoints

Consider a dark-energy-dominated future with constant $w_\infty<-1/3$. Direct evaluation of the future event horizon gives

$$\boxed{ c_\infty=H_\infty L_\infty =-\frac{2}{1+3w_\infty} }.$$

If

$$-1<w_\infty<-\frac13,$$

then $c_\infty>1$. The event horizon grows, but the upper black-hole bound fails. If

$$w_\infty<-1,$$

then $c_\infty<1$, $HL<1$ and $\dot L<0$. The event horizon and its area entropy shrink, ending in the constant-$c$ case at a Big Rip.

Both requirements can hold only when $c_\infty=1$, which implies

$$\boxed{ w_\infty=-1, \qquad c_\infty=1 }.$$

The entropy sandwich is therefore the physically important result. Under the assumptions of flat FLRW general relativity, separate dark-energy conservation, dark-energy domination, asymptotically constant $w$, constant $G$, the event horizon as the infrared scale, the saturated HDE relation, the black-hole energy bound and nondecreasing event-horizon area, it acts as a no-go theorem against both asymptotic phantom and asymptotic quintessence event-horizon HDE, leaving de Sitter as the sole constant-$w$ endpoint.

The $\Lambda$CDM running law

$$\boxed{c'=c-\sqrt{\Omega_\Lambda}}$$

supplies one exact interior trajectory through the allowed corridor

$$\sqrt{\Omega_\Lambda}\le c\le1.$$

It is an exact geometric reconstruction, not yet a microscopic derivation of that trajectory.

7. Advance, Dead End and Remaining Problem

The advance is the unified structure:

$$\boxed{ \text{constant }c<1 \longrightarrow \text{phantom crossing} \longrightarrow \text{Hubble minimum} \longrightarrow \text{shrinking horizon} \longrightarrow \text{Big Rip} }.$$

The entropy corridor instead forces the late-time endpoint toward $c\to1$, $w\to-1$, provided both area conditions are imposed.

The dead end is unrestricted $c(a)$. Given any admissible accelerating history, one can define

$$c(a)=L(a)\sqrt{\frac{\rho_{\rm de}(a)}{3M_p^2}},$$

and rewrite that history as HDE. Without an independent equation for $c$, variable-$c$ HDE is a representation rather than a predictive theory.

Likewise,

$$c^2=\frac{S_e}{S_{\rm dS}}$$

is rigorously an area ratio when an asymptotic de Sitter reference scale $H_\Lambda$ is independently defined. Interpreting it as a microscopic filling fraction, phase variable or quantum flow requires additional physics.

The next step is to derive $c(a)$ independently from an action, horizon thermodynamics or microscopic state counting. Such a theory must preserve the entropy corridor, determine cosmic perturbations, explain the observed energy scale and produce a test that distinguishes it from $\Lambda$CDM.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blurring the horizon - the quantum width of the cosmic event horizon

A  paper by Zurek applied a random walk argument to a black hole horizon. Credit, Zurek, 2022  Zurek  ( Snowmass White Paper: Observational Signatures of Quantum Gravity )  called this a blurring of the horizon: a fuzzy, or uncertain horizon, and went through derivations supporting the idea that this length scale is the quantum uncertainty in the position of the black hole horizon: a dynamic quantum width of an event horizon. This is a concept which fundamentally applies to the Universe's own Cosmic Event Horizon (CEH).   Below, we step out our own derivation of the random walk argument, giving us the phenomenological signature Zurek found: $$\Delta x^2 = 2DT$$ In this equation, $\Delta x$ is the position uncertainty, $D$ is the Einstein diffusion coefficient, and $T$ is the time between measurements (the relaxation time). Einstein Diffusion Coefficient So, let's look at the Einstein diffusion coefficient. $\mu = v_d / F$ is the mobility and $v_d$ is...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Cosmic Strange Metal?

        Strange metals have no long-lived particle-like excitations. They relax near the fastest rate allowed by temperature and can scramble information rapidly. Space itself is not a strange metal. However, the de Sitter stretched horizon may share its Planckian transport pattern: $$\boxed{\text{The cosmic horizon may be a Planckian quantum fluid.}}$$ Horizon temperature For de Sitter space, $$R_H=\frac{c}{H}, \qquad T_{dS}=\frac{\hbar H}{2\pi k_B}.$$ Two related thermal timescales are $$\tau_T=\frac{\hbar}{k_BT_{dS}}=\frac{2\pi}{H}, \qquad \tau_{\rm ch}=\frac{\hbar}{2\pi k_BT_{dS}}=\frac1H.$$ Thus the horizon has no macroscopic clock other than $H^{-1}$, up to numerical factors. Einstein gravity dissipation In the membrane description, $$\eta_{\rm mem}=\frac{c^3}{16\pi G}, \qquad s_{\rm mem}=\frac{k_Bc^3}{4G\hbar}.$$ Therefore $$\boxed{ \frac{\eta_{\rm mem}}{s_{\rm mem}} =\frac{\hbar}{4\pi k_B}. }$$ This is the Einstein-gravity membrane value, also ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Our cosmic event horizon on a string

A Cosmic Stringy Adventure !   Requiring the reduced Compton wavelength to fit within a cosmic event horizon results in a "minimum mass" (this is not a minimum particle mass) $m_s = \frac{\hbar}{c l_{\Lambda}}$.   In this post  we interpret $m_s$ as a horizon energy gap and model the associated gravitational scale as a  lightlike energy flow along an effective classical string.   McDormand with a cosmic light-like energy flow $m_{s}$ along a string of minimal  radius $2L_p$, giving a centripetal force $F_{max}=c^4/4G$.    Mass-Energy Flux Along the String   Let's think about that string for a bit. In fact, a great number of physicists have spent their entire careers tied up  unravelling  string theory . For a classical string associated with Nambu-Goto action, the the string tension $T_G$ is a local force, or energy per unit length (dimensions $MLT^{-2}$): \begin{equation} \notag T_G = \frac{1}{2\pi \alpha_G \prime} \e...
Post a Comment
Read more