Processing math: 100%
Skip to main content

Blurring the horizon - the quantum width of the cosmic event horizon

A 2021 paper by Zurek applied a random walk argument to a black hole horizon.

  Credit, Zurek, 2021

Zurek called this a blurring of the horizon (a fuzzy, or uncertain horizon), and also went through some equivalent derivations, which basically supported the idea this length scale is the quantum uncertainty in the position of the BH horizon, aka a dynamic quantum width of an event horizon (a concept which would therefore also apply to the universe's own CEH). The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy gives the number of quantum degrees of freedom that can fluctuate. Below, we step out our own cosmic de-Sitter derivation of the random walk argument, obtaining the same result as Zurek did, so its certainly correct!

Δx2=2DT

In this equation, Δx is the position uncertainty, D is the Einstein diffusion coefficient and T is the time between measurements (aka the relaxation time).  

 So, lets look at the Einstein diffusion coefficient. μ=vd/F is the mobility and vd is the drift velocity. We know from this post that the string tension is a local force, so F=TG=c4/8πG. Drift velocity is acceleration × relaxation time, the time between two successive collisions. If we take acceleration to be BH surface acceleration κ=a/2 and relaxation time as the inverse of the Hubble constant, i.e. T=lΛ/c, we get vd=c/2.  Then:

D=μkBTBH=Lpc2

   We can then work out that Δx=2 Lp where Lp is the Planck Length! Or we can write the nice equation (a geometric mean) or seesaw-like relation (in 4 dimensions):

Δx=LplΛ

In fact, this is also what you get from from the position uncertainty of a QH oscillator. We have talked before about that - just use the zero-point energy m0 and wB and presto!

Not so coincidently, this is the same relation that Bousso and Penington (B&P) finds that the protrusion distance outside the horizon of an entanglement island from a 4D Schwarzschild black hole! 

Zurek also  pointed out that the equality SBH=Sent is known to be true only in certain systems, however, there is evidence this equality holds more generally.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remarks on the cosmological constant and minimal acceleration

As Lineweaver explained, because our Universe is expanding at an accelerating rate, our Universe has a cosmic event horizon (CEH).    Its an event horizon Jim, but not as we know it...Image credit: DALL.E2 by SR Anderson Events beyond the CEH will never be observed. The CEH is also the source of de Sitter radiation, which has a specific temperature TdS. It is the minimum possible temperature of the Universe, and, it is not absolute zero (zero Kelvins). Numerically TdS2.4×1030K, the universal minimum (black body) `absolute cold' local temperature of the future dS state. As a comparison, in 2020 the NASA Cold Atom lab was able to cool an atom to a record low 2×107K.  Now, in any theory one may think of temperature as an energy, and from the semi-classical Unruh relationship, temperature acceleration. Therefore:   EdS=Tds kB=a2πc
What we g...

Dark photons and the Universal ground-state energy

 In a previous post we introduced the idea that our current Universe has boundary conditions.    Classical 1+1 dS space-time visualized as basketball hoop, with the up/down slam-dunk direction being the time dimension, and the hoop circumference the space dimension.    We also showed a diagram similar to Figure 1 below. Except here, we are once again thinking about the future dS state . Figure 1 . For an observer at O inside the cosmic event horizon (CEH) with radius lΛ, the universe can be divided into two sub-vacuums, (A) inside the CEH, and (B), outside. The horizon surface Σ has entanglement entropy SdS and rest energy EH   Figure 2. The maximum entropy of the Universe (credit: Lineweaver ).   Now, a comoving volume partition of the Universe can be treated as a closed system for which dS0. The maximum entropy of a closed system, in this case  ( Figure 2 ) with L=2πlΛ, the circum...