A 2021 paper by Zurek applied a random walk argument to a black hole horizon.
Credit, Zurek, 2021
Zurek called this a
blurring of the horizon (a fuzzy, or uncertain horizon), and also went
through some equivalent derivations, which basically supported the idea
this length scale is the quantum uncertainty in the position of the BH
horizon, aka a dynamic quantum width of an event horizon (a concept which would therefore also apply to the universe's own CEH). The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy gives the number of quantum degrees of freedom that can fluctuate. Below, we step out our own cosmic de-Sitter derivation of the random walk argument, obtaining the same result as Zurek did, so its certainly correct!
Δx2=2DT
So, lets look at the Einstein diffusion coefficient. μ=vd/F is the mobility and vd is the drift velocity. We know from this post that the string tension is a local force, so F=TG=c4/8πG. Drift velocity is acceleration × relaxation time, the time between two successive collisions. If we take acceleration to be BH surface acceleration κ=a/2 and relaxation time as the inverse of the Hubble constant, i.e. T=lΛ/c, we get vd=c/2. Then:
D=μkBTBH=Lpc2
Δx=√LplΛ
In fact, this is also what you get from from the position uncertainty of a QH oscillator. We have talked before about that - just use the zero-point energy m0 and wB and presto!
Not so coincidently, this is the same relation that Bousso and Penington (B&P) finds that the protrusion distance outside the horizon of an entanglement island from a 4D Schwarzschild black hole!
Zurek also pointed out that the equality SBH=Sent is known to be true only in certain systems, however, there is evidence this equality holds more generally.
Comments
Post a Comment