Skip to main content

Posts

The Riemann Hypothesis as a Stability Principle

  The Riemann Hypothesis can be reformulated as an infinite sequence of explicit positivity tests. This is not a proof. It turns a statement about complex zeros into inequalities that can be calculated, falsified at finite order, and compared with operator or physical models.   The completed zeta function is $$\xi(s)=\frac12s(s-1)\pi^{-s/2}\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta(s),$$ with $$\Xi(t)=\xi\left(\frac12+it\right).$$ The function $\Xi$ is even and real on the real axis. A nontrivial zero $\rho=\beta+i\gamma$ corresponds to $$t_\rho=\gamma-i\left(\beta-\frac12\right).$$ Therefore $$t_\rho\in\mathbb R \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \beta=\frac12,$$ and hence $$\boxed{\mathrm{RH}\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad\text{every zero of }\Xi\text{ is real}.}$$ Folding the Zeros Because $\Xi$ is even, write $$\Xi(t)=\sum_{n\ge0}c_nt^{2n}.$$ Now define $$G(z)=\frac{\Xi(i\sqrt z)}{\Xi(0)}.$$ Although this contains $\sqrt z$, the even expansion makes $G$ entire: $$G(z)=...
Recent posts

The Horizon Quantum of Area

  Several independent semiclassical arguments converge on $$\boxed{\Delta A=8\pi l_{\mathrm{Pl}}^2}, \qquad l_{\mathrm{Pl}}^2=\frac{G\hbar}{c^3}$$ I got interested in this reading the 2018 paper  Bekenstein, I, and the quantum of black-hole surface area . Even though I disagree with Hod, its a great paper.  Honourable mentions also go to:   The Physical Interpretation of the Spectrum of Black Hole Quasinormal Modes , 2008  The Off-Shell Black Hole , 1994     On Black Hole Spectroscopy via Adiabatic Invariance , 2012 An Analytical Computation of Asymptotic Schwarzschild Quasinormal Frequencies , 2003  Asymptotic Black Hole Quasinormal Frequencies , 2003  1. Horizon Action Near any nonextremal horizon, imaginary time turns the normal geometry into a plane: $$ds_E^2\simeq d\rho^2+\rho^2d\Theta^2+\cdots.$$ Smoothness requires one horizon cycle: $$\oint d\Theta=2\pi.$$ The gravitational action identifies the momentum conjugate to $\The...

One Dark Scale, One Galactic Law

      We previously  discussed Verlinde's connection of the MOND acceleration scale to the entropy of de Sitter space. A different route appears in superfluid dark matter (a 2026 review is here ), where baryons interact with a phonon field whose nonlinear dynamics generate a MOND-like force. The superfluid theory introduces a characteristic scale $\Lambda_{\rm SF}$, which must be of order meV to reproduce the MOND scale. This is also the order of the vacuum-energy scale, $\rho_{\rm DE}^{1/4}\sim{\rm meV}$.  So, we postulate $\Lambda_{\rm SF}^4=\rho_{\rm DE}$.    This idea obviously points to a unified dark sector , e.g. 2019 Unified Superfluid Dark Sector , 2026 A solid unification of the dark sector , and 2026 Unified dark sector approach to cosmological tensions   among many others. Indeed, a complete theory would no longer ask “What particle is dark energy?” Dark energy would instead be the vacuum energy of the same medium whose excitations...

What If Dark Gravity Is Just Entropy Winning?

  A Minimal Entropic Reconstruction of MOND-like Gravity Motivation Verlinde  (2016) proposed that de Sitter space contains a volume-scaling entropy associated with dark energy. Matter removes part of this entropy. Beyond a critical scale, the remaining volume entropy dominates and produces an apparent dark gravitational component.  Peach  (2019) reformulated the idea using an entropic-screen construction.  The argument below combines these ideas and fixes the force normalisation using Verlinde's spherical response coefficient. Competing Entropies For a sphere of radius $r$, the de Sitter entropy is $$S_{\rm DE}(r) = \frac{r}{L}\frac{A(r)c^3}{4G\hbar}, \qquad A(r)=4\pi r^2,$$ while a central mass $M$ removes $$S_M(r)=\frac{2\pi Mc}{\hbar}r.$$ Thus $S_{\rm DE}\propto r^3$ and $S_M\propto r$. Define $a_\Lambda=c^2/L$. Their ratio is $$\frac{S_{\rm DE}}{S_M} = \frac{a_\Lambda r^2}{2GM} = \left(\frac{r}{r_c}\right)^2,$$ where $$\boxed{r_c=\sqrt{\frac{2GM}...

A First Quantum Horizon and Cosmic Information

  Consider a spherical Schwarzschild horizon of radius $R$. Its energy, temperature, and entropy are $$E=\frac{c^{4}R}{2G},\qquad k_BT_H=\frac{\hbar c}{4\pi R},\qquad S=\frac{k_BA}{4L_P^2},$$ where $A=4\pi R^2$ and $L_P^2=\hbar G/c^3$. 1. Quantized Horizon The horizon's thermal period defines an angular frequency $$\omega_H=\frac{2\pi k_BT_H}{\hbar}=\frac{c}{2R}.$$ Treat the Euclidean horizon cycle as a periodic quantum motion and define its action by $dI=dE/\omega_H$. Since $dE=c^4dR/2G$, we obtain $dI=c^3RdR/G$, and therefore $$I=\frac{c^3R^2}{2G} =\frac{\hbar R^2}{2L_P^2} =\frac{\hbar A}{8\pi L_P^2}.$$ Equivalently, using $dE=T_HdS$, $$I=\frac{\hbar S}{2\pi k_B}.$$ Quantizing this periodic motion gives $$I_n=\left(n+\frac12\right)\hbar, \qquad n=0,1,2,\ldots$$ where the half-unit is the ground-state contribution associated with the regular centre of the Euclidean horizon geometry. Hence $$A_n=4\pi(2n+1)L_P^2, \qquad R_n=\sqrt{2n+1},L_P.$$ Thus the first nonzero hor...

Minimum and Maximum Mass from the Cosmic Horizon

  A positive cosmological constant sets the future cosmic event-horizon radius of an expanding FLRW universe: $$l_\Lambda=\sqrt{\frac{3}{\Lambda}}.$$ Associate two lengths with a positive mass $m$: $$\bar\lambda_C=\frac{\hbar}{mc} \qquad r_g=\frac{2Gm}{c^2}$$ where $\bar\lambda_C$ is the reduced Compton wavelength and $r_g$ is the gravitational radius. Requiring both lengths not to exceed the cosmic horizon, $$\bar\lambda_C\le l_\Lambda \qquad r_g\le l_\Lambda,$$ gives $$\boxed{ m_{\min}= m_s=\frac{\hbar}{cl_\Lambda} =\frac{\hbar}{c}\sqrt{\frac{\Lambda}{3}} }$$ $m_s$ is the minimum mass first pointed out by Wesson , 2003. This was also adopted by  Bohmer and Harko , 2005 to derive a  minimum density for static bodies  using the cosmological Buchdahl inequality. and $$\boxed{ m_{\max}=\frac{c^2l_\Lambda}{2G} =\frac{c^2}{2G}\sqrt{\frac{3}{\Lambda}} \equiv m_{\rm CEH}. }$$ Wesson also conjectured a maximum mass, but was off by a factor of 2, as well ...

Is ΛCDM Holographic?

 $\Lambda$CDM and Holographic Dark Energy   Holographic dark energy (HDE) starts from a simple thought: the energy inside a region of size $L$ shouldn't exceed that of a black hole of the same size.   1. Definition and Basic Geometry Event-horizon holographic dark energy is defined by $$\rho_{\rm de}=3M_p^2\frac{c(a)^2}{L(a)^2},$$ where $c(a)>0$ is dimensionless and $$L(a)=a\int_a^\infty\frac{da'}{a'^2H(a')}$$ is the future event horizon. Li's original 2004 model takes $c$ to be constant. Define $$\Omega_{\rm de}=\frac{\rho_{\rm de}}{3M_p^2H^2}.$$ Then $$\boxed{HL=\frac{c}{\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm de}}}}.$$ Differentiating the horizon definition gives $$\boxed{\dot L=HL-1}.$$ Primes below denote $d/d\ln a$. 2. General Equation of State For separately conserved dark energy, $$\rho_{\rm de}'+3(1+w_{\rm de})\rho_{\rm de}=0.$$ Because $\rho_{\rm de}\propto c^2L^{-2}$, $$\frac{\rho_{\rm de}'}{\rho_{\rm de}} =2\frac{c'}c-2\frac{L'}L.$$ The h...

Popular posts from this blog

Blurring the horizon - the quantum width of the cosmic event horizon

A  paper by Zurek applied a random walk argument to a black hole horizon. Credit, Zurek, 2022  Zurek  ( Snowmass White Paper: Observational Signatures of Quantum Gravity )  called this a blurring of the horizon: a fuzzy, or uncertain horizon, and went through derivations supporting the idea that this length scale is the quantum uncertainty in the position of the black hole horizon: a dynamic quantum width of an event horizon. This is a concept which fundamentally applies to the Universe's own Cosmic Event Horizon (CEH).   Below, we step out our own derivation of the random walk argument, giving us the phenomenological signature Zurek found: $$\Delta x^2 = 2DT$$ In this equation, $\Delta x$ is the position uncertainty, $D$ is the Einstein diffusion coefficient, and $T$ is the time between measurements (the relaxation time). Einstein Diffusion Coefficient So, let's look at the Einstein diffusion coefficient. $\mu = v_d / F$ is the mobility and $v_d$ is...

The Cosmic Strange Metal?

        Strange metals have no long-lived particle-like excitations. They relax near the fastest rate allowed by temperature and can scramble information rapidly. Space itself is not a strange metal. However, the de Sitter stretched horizon may share its Planckian transport pattern: $$\boxed{\text{The cosmic horizon may be a Planckian quantum fluid.}}$$ Horizon temperature For de Sitter space, $$R_H=\frac{c}{H}, \qquad T_{dS}=\frac{\hbar H}{2\pi k_B}.$$ Two related thermal timescales are $$\tau_T=\frac{\hbar}{k_BT_{dS}}=\frac{2\pi}{H}, \qquad \tau_{\rm ch}=\frac{\hbar}{2\pi k_BT_{dS}}=\frac1H.$$ Thus the horizon has no macroscopic clock other than $H^{-1}$, up to numerical factors. Einstein gravity dissipation In the membrane description, $$\eta_{\rm mem}=\frac{c^3}{16\pi G}, \qquad s_{\rm mem}=\frac{k_Bc^3}{4G\hbar}.$$ Therefore $$\boxed{ \frac{\eta_{\rm mem}}{s_{\rm mem}} =\frac{\hbar}{4\pi k_B}. }$$ This is the Einstein-gravity membrane value, also ...

Our cosmic event horizon on a string

A Cosmic Stringy Adventure !   Requiring the reduced Compton wavelength to fit within a cosmic event horizon results in a "minimum mass" (this is not a minimum particle mass) $m_s = \frac{\hbar}{c l_{\Lambda}}$.   In this post  we interpret $m_s$ as a horizon energy gap and model the associated gravitational scale as a  lightlike energy flow along an effective classical string.   McDormand with a cosmic light-like energy flow $m_{s}$ along a string of minimal  radius $2L_p$, giving a centripetal force $F_{max}=c^4/4G$.    Mass-Energy Flux Along the String   Let's think about that string for a bit. In fact, a great number of physicists have spent their entire careers tied up  unravelling  string theory . For a classical string associated with Nambu-Goto action, the the string tension $T_G$ is a local force, or energy per unit length (dimensions $MLT^{-2}$): \begin{equation} \notag T_G = \frac{1}{2\pi \alpha_G \prime} \e...