How running gravity, anomaly-driven vacuum energy, and quantum error correction combine to explain cosmic tensions, while preserving ΛCDM ΛCDM fits the CMB, large-scale structure, and nucleosynthesis exceptionally well. And yet: The locally measured Hubble constant ($H_0$) is higher than the Planck CMB prediction Weak lensing surveys find lower clustering amplitude ($S_8$) than ΛCDM predicts These are small but persistent discrepancies. Rather than discarding ΛCDM, what if these tensions are subtle signals about how vacuum energy and gravity behave dynamically? 1. Core Idea: Mildly Running Gravity Standard ΛCDM Vacuum energy is constant: $$\rho_\Lambda = \text{const.}$$ ARG 3.3: Running Gravity with Anomaly Source In Anomalous Running Gravity (ARG 3.3) , we promote vacuum energy and Newton's constant to dynamic quantities sourced by the trace anomaly of quantum fields and a Gauss–Bonnet term: $$S \supset \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \frac{b}{(4\pi)^2}\ln\left(\frac...
Or, dark energy is the thermodynamic cost of maintaining quantum error correction (QEC) in an expanding computational substrate—spacetime itself is a quantum code . In a QEC spacetime, you don’t need a literal CPU (this isn't The Matrix ). The computation is encoded in the dynamics of the underlying microscopic degrees of freedom, and topological protection ensures coherence. The “code” and the “hardware” are unified. 1. Introduction Dark energy is commonly modelled as a cosmological constant, a fluid, or a scalar field. We explore another idea kicking around: dark energy is the computational cost of maintaining quantum coherence in spacetime. This framework can unify three previously distinct approaches: Viscoelastic / stochastic spacetime : local elastic and viscous responses, stochastic stress from coarse-grained quantum fluctuations Topological Berry phase : global invariants of the vacuum manifold, protecting $\Lambda$ QEC / computational : microscop...