The fabric of space-time: stiffer than steel or weaker than jello?

The ~~notorious~~ rubber sheet analogy of spacetime teaches one concept and once concept only: Mass-energy causes curvature of space-time.

When a gravitating mass recedes from a region of space-time the curvature diminishes. The field equations of General Relativity don’t have an explicit term for this elastic property, but the framework as a whole does have that property. As very large mass-energies are required to generate gravitational waves (ripples in space-time), the elastic property of space-time is generally regarded as very stiff

One other interesting consideration here is that elasticity is an emergent phenomenon. There is a great deal of interest in the idea that gravity is similarly emergent.

In 2018, McDonald quantified the classical stiffness of space-time via Youngs Modulus.

Classical answer: Youngs Modulus of space-time $\sim$ 20 orders of magnitude greater than steel.

DALL.E2 depiction of classical space-time. (Credit SR Anderson)

In a previous post we discussed de Sitter space-time, which is space-time with no matter, just vacuum, and its associated energy-density, the cosmological constant.

Vacuum is the fabric of space-time.

In a quantum Universe, the Youngs Modulus of space-time is frequency independent, limited by the energy density of the medium through which the gravity wave propagates.

In dS space, the medium is vacuum, and the energy density is the cosmological constant. In our current Universe, which includes matter, the energy density is the critical density.

Either way, what this means, as Melissinos pointed out in a rejoinder to McDonald:

Quantum answer: Youngs Modulus of space-time $\sim$ 14 orders of magnitude less than jello!

Why the massive discrepancy between these two answers? It is because the results are just another way of stating the cosmological constant problem.

Since actual observations of our Universe confirm that the vacuum energy density is very low - the smart money is on jello, not steel.

Youngs Modulus can also be related to the spring constant $k$ (the measure of a spring's stiffness), of a quantum harmonic oscillator via Hooke's Law, which holds up to the so-called proportionality limit i.e. when extension is linearly proportional to the load applied. The relation is: \begin{equation}
\notag
Y_\Lambda = \frac{k \ L}{A}\
\end{equation} So, with a "cosmic string" of the de Sitter characteristic length $l_{\Lambda}$ and a cross-sectional vector area $A=1/ \Lambda$, with a quantum Youngs Modulus of vacuum: $Y_\Lambda = \Lambda c^4 / 8 \pi G$, the spring constant of vacuum $k$ is:

\begin{equation}
\notag
k = \frac{c^4}{8 \pi G \ l_{\Lambda}}
\end{equation} The term $c^4 / 8 \pi G$ is the inverse of the Einstein gravitational constant.

Comments

Remarks on the cosmological constant and minimal acceleration

As Lineweaver explained, because our Universe is expanding at an accelerating rate, our Universe has a cosmic event horizon (CEH). Its an event horizon Jim, but not as we know it...Image credit: DALL.E2 by SR Anderson Events beyond the CEH will never be observed. The CEH is also the source of de Sitter radiation, which has a specific temperature $T_{dS}$. It is the minimum possible temperature of the Universe, and, it is not absolute zero (zero Kelvins). Numerically $T_{dS} \approx 2.4 \times 10^{-30}K$, the universal minimum (black body) `absolute cold' local temperature of the future dS state. As a comparison, in 2020 the NASA Cold Atom lab was able to cool an atom to a record low $\sim 2 \times 10^{-7}K$. Now, in any theory one may think of temperature as an energy, and from the semi-classical Unruh relationship, temperature $\sim$ acceleration. Therefore: \begin{equation} \notag E_{dS} = T_{ds} \ k_B= \frac {\hslash a}{2\pi c} \end{equation} What we get from Unruh i

Our cosmic event horizon on a string

In this post, we introduced the idea that in the presence of a positive cosmological constant, there is a minimum (local) mass $m_{GR}$ McDormand swinging a cosmic light-like mass-energy $m_{GR}$, with a "cosmic string" of radius $l_{\Lambda}$, giving a centripetal force $F_{local}=m_{GR} \ c^2/l_{\Lambda}$. Let's think about that string for a bit. In fact, a great number of physicists have spent their entire careers tied up unraveling string theory . For a classical string, which lives in D = 10 dimensions, associated with Nambu-Goto action, the the string tension $T_G$ is a local force, or energy per unit length (dimensions $MLT^{-2}$): \begin{equation} \notag T_G = \frac{1}{2\pi \alpha \prime} \end{equation}$\alpha \prime$ is the Regge slope parameter, set here with dimensions of inverse force. The wavelength of the stringy mass-energy standing wave (such that it does not interfere with itself), is the circumference of the circle, and we know it moves at l

Dark photons and the Universal ground-state energy

In a previous post we introduced the idea that our current Universe has boundary conditions. Classical 1+1 dS space-time visualized as basketball hoop, with the up/down slam-dunk direction being the time dimension, and the hoop circumference the space dimension. We also showed a diagram similar to Figure 1 below. Except here, we are once again thinking about the future dS state . Figure 1 . For an observer at O inside the cosmic event horizon (CEH) with radius $l_{\Lambda}$, the universe can be divided into two sub-vacuums, $(A)$ inside the CEH, and $(B)$, outside. The horizon surface $\Sigma$ has entanglement entropy $S_{dS}$ and rest energy $E_H$ Figure 2. The maximum entropy of the Universe (credit: Lineweaver ). Now, a comoving volume partition of the Universe can be treated as a closed system for which $dS \geq0$. The maximum entropy of a closed system, in this case ( Figure 2 ) with $L=2 \pi l_{\Lambda}$, the circumference of a circle with radius $l_{\Lambd

What have electrons, black holes and Clifford Algebra ever done for us?

Search This Blog