The fabric of space-time: stiffer than steel or weaker than jello?

 

The notorious rubber sheet analogy of spacetime teaches one concept and once concept only: Mass-energy causes curvature of space-time.

 When a gravitating mass recedes from a region of space-time the curvature diminishes. The field equations of General Relativity don’t have an explicit term for this elastic property, but the framework as a whole does have that property. As very large mass-energies are required to generate gravitational waves (ripples in space-time), the elastic property of space-time is generally regarded as very stiff

One other interesting consideration here is that elasticity is an emergent phenomenon. There is a great deal of interest in the idea that gravity is similarly emergent.  

In 2018, McDonald quantified the classical stiffness of space-time via Youngs Modulus.

 Classical answer: Youngs Modulus of space-time $\sim$ 20 orders of magnitude greater than steel.  

DALL.E2 depiction of classical space-time. (Credit SR Anderson)  

In a previous post we discussed de Sitter space-time, which is space-time with no matter, just vacuum, and its associated energy-density, the cosmological constant. 

Vacuum is the fabric of space-time.   

 In a quantum Universe, the Youngs Modulus of space-time is frequency independent, limited by the energy density of the medium through which the gravity wave propagates. 

In dS space, the medium is vacuum, and the energy density is the cosmological constant. In our current Universe, which includes matter, the energy density is the critical density.  

Either way, what this means, as Melissinos pointed out in a rejoinder to McDonald:

Quantum answer: Youngs Modulus of space-time $\sim$ 14 orders of magnitude less than jello! 

 

Why the massive discrepancy between these two answers? It is because the results are just another way of stating the cosmological constant problem.     

 

Since actual observations of our Universe confirm that the vacuum energy density is very low - the smart money is on jello, not steel.

Youngs Modulus can also be related to the spring constant $k$ (the measure of a spring's stiffness), of a quantum harmonic oscillator via Hooke's Law, which holds up to the so-called proportionality limit i.e. when extension is linearly proportional to the load applied. The relation is:   $$\begin{equation} \notag Y_\Lambda = \frac{k \ L}{A}\ \end{equation}$$ So, with a "cosmic string" of the de Sitter characteristic length $l_{\Lambda}$ and a cross-sectional vector area $A=1/ \Lambda$, with a quantum Youngs Modulus of vacuum: $Y_\Lambda = \Lambda c^4 / 8 \pi G$, the spring constant of vacuum $k$ is:

$$\begin{equation} \notag k = \frac{c^4}{8 \pi G \ l_{\Lambda}} \end{equation}$$ The term $c^4 / 8 \pi G$ is the inverse of the Einstein gravitational constant.