Skip to main content

Is ΛCDM Holographic?

 $\Lambda$CDM and Holographic Dark Energy   Holographic dark energy is usually written $$\rho_{\rm DE} = 3M_p^2\frac{c^2}{L^2}$$ where $c$ is a dimensionless HDE parameter and $L$ is an infrared cutoff. In Li's 2004 model, $$L=L_e \equiv a(t)\int_t^\infty\frac{dt'}{a(t')}$$ is the future event horizon. Li assumed constant $c$, giving $$w_{\rm DE} = -\frac13 \left( 1+\frac{2\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm DE}}}{c} \right).$$ However, with $c=1$ and $\Omega_{{\rm DE},0}=0.6889$, $w_0\simeq-0.887$, rather than $w=-1$.  Does not match observations! Also, constant-$c$ observational fits often give $c<1$, leading to phantom evolution, null-energy-condition violation and a turning point in $H(z)$. That conclusion assumes $c'=0$.  What about if $c$ is not constant?  Then:  $$c<1, \qquad c'=c-\sqrt{\Omega_\Lambda}>0, \qquad w=-1.$$ Therefore $\dot H = -4\pi G(\rho_m+\frac43\rho_r) \le0$, so there is no finite-redshift turning point and no phantom phase. Thus ...
Post a Comment

Zeta Zeros as Logarithmic Spiral Waves

Zeta Zeros as Logarithmic Spiral Waves

Matthew R. Watkins gives a striking geometric interpretation of the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function as generating "spiral wave" contributions whose superposition encodes fluctuations in Chebyshev's prime-counting function $\psi(x)$. Watkins observes that $x^\rho$ maps the positive real axis onto a logarithmic spiral, while conjugate zeros combine to produce real logarithmically rescaled waveforms.

See: Matthew R. Watkins, "Encoding the Zeta Zeros" 

 

The algebra below is elementary complex exponentiation; Watkins's contribution is the geometric spiral-wave interpretation.

Let $\rho=\beta+i\gamma$ and $t=\ln x$. Then

$$x^\rho=e^{\rho\ln x} = e^{\beta t}e^{i\gamma t} = e^{\beta t}\left(\cos(\gamma t)+i\sin(\gamma t)\right).$$

So $\beta$ is the amplitude growth rate in logarithmic time, and $\gamma$ is the angular frequency in logarithmic time. The frequency in cycles per unit $t$ is $f=|\gamma|/(2\pi)$.

1. The Logarithmic Spiral

Writing $x^\rho=re^{i\theta}$ gives $r(t)=e^{\beta t}$ and $\theta(t)=\gamma t$. Eliminating $t$,

$$r=e^{(\beta/\gamma)\theta}.$$

This is a logarithmic spiral: $\beta$ controls radial growth, $\gamma$ controls rotation.

2. The Explicit-Formula Factor $1/\rho$

Explicit formulas contain terms $x^\rho/\rho$. Since $\rho=|\rho|e^{i\arg\rho}$,

$$\frac{x^\rho}{\rho} = \frac{x^\beta}{|\rho|} e^{i(\gamma\ln x-\arg\rho)}.$$

The factor $1/\rho$ contributes only a constant amplitude scaling $|\rho|^{-1}$ and a constant phase shift $-\arg\rho$. It does not change $\beta$ or $\gamma$.

3. Conjugate Zeros Produce a Real Logarithmic Wave

Nontrivial zeros occur in conjugate pairs $\rho=\beta+i\gamma$, $\bar\rho=\beta-i\gamma$. Their sum is real:

$$\frac{x^\rho}{\rho} + \frac{x^{\bar\rho}}{\bar\rho} = \frac{2x^\beta}{|\rho|} \cos!\left(\gamma\ln x-\arg\rho\right).$$

The amplitude envelope is $A(x)=2x^\beta/|\rho|$ and the phase is $\phi(x)=\gamma\ln x-\arg\rho$. Note the instantaneous angular frequency with respect to $x$ itself decreases as $\gamma/x$.

4. Amplitude Growth per Revolution

After one complete revolution $\Delta t = 2\pi/|\gamma| = 1/f$, the amplitude ratio is

$$W = e^{\beta\Delta t} = e^{\beta/f} = e^{2\pi\beta/|\gamma|},$$

giving the key relation

$$\beta = f\ln W.$$

Higher-frequency zeros grow less per revolution.

5. The Riemann Hypothesis

RH states $\beta=1/2$ for every nontrivial zero. Then $r(x)=\sqrt{x}$, and the conjugate-pair wave becomes

$$\frac{x^\rho}{\rho} + \frac{x^{\bar\rho}}{\bar\rho} = \frac{2\sqrt{x}}{|\rho|} \cos!\left(\gamma\ln x-\arg\rho\right),$$

with per-revolution growth $W=e^{\pi/|\gamma|}$.

RH is precisely the statement that all zero-modes share the same amplitude growth rate. The relation $\beta = f\ln W$ makes this transparent: fixing $\beta=1/2$ universally across all frequencies means every mode, regardless of its logarithmic frequency $f$, grows at the same rate — giving the common envelope $\sqrt{x}$.

6. Superposition and Prime-Counting Fluctuations

Explicit formulas sum over all zeros:

$$\sum_{\gamma>0} \frac{2x^\beta}{|\rho|} \cos!\left(\gamma\ln x-\arg\rho\right).$$

Each zero contributes its amplitude growth rate $\beta$, logarithmic angular frequency $\gamma$, phase shift $\arg\rho$, and amplitude weighting $|\rho|^{-1}$. This is the sense in which the nontrivial zeros form a spectral system encoding fluctuations in the primes.

Final Correspondence

$$\rho=\beta+i\gamma \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x^\rho=e^{\beta t}e^{i\gamma t}, \qquad t=\ln x.$$

Each nontrivial zero is a logarithmic spiral mode. Its conjugate partner produces a real logarithmic wave. The four quantities read off from each zero are:

  • $\beta$ — amplitude growth rate, with $\beta = f\ln W$
  • $\gamma$ — logarithmic angular frequency
  • $\arg\rho$ — phase shift
  • $|\rho|^{-1}$ — amplitude weighting

Under RH every mode shares the common envelope $\sqrt{x}$. Watkins's spiral-wave picture is captured entirely by $x^\rho=e^{\rho\ln x}$, with $\beta$ and $\gamma$ controlling amplitude growth and oscillation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blurring the horizon - the quantum width of the cosmic event horizon

A  paper by Zurek applied a random walk argument to a black hole horizon. Credit, Zurek, 2021 Zurek  ( Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Observational Signatures of Quantum Gravity )  called this a blurring of the horizon — a fuzzy, or uncertain horizon — and went through derivations supporting the idea that this length scale is the quantum uncertainty in the position of the black hole horizon: a dynamic quantum width of an event horizon. This is a concept which fundamentally applies to the Universe's own Cosmic Event Horizon (CEH). The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy gives the number of quantum degrees of freedom that can fluctuate. Below, we step out our own cosmic de Sitter derivation of the random walk argument. To do this, let $l_{\Lambda}$ represent the generalised de Sitter horizon scale. Due to the holographic UV/IR correspondence, this scale manifests dually: at the fundamental microscopic limit as $l_{UV} = 2L_p$ (the gravitational/casual limit, aka the Schwarzschild radi...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Cosmic Strange Metal

      Strange metals, quantum spin liquids, and SYK-like systems share a striking transport pattern: no quasiparticles, strong collective dynamics, Planckian relaxation, near-minimal viscosity, and maximal chaos. Their characteristic data are $$\frac{\eta}{s}=\frac{\hbar}{4\pi k_B}, \qquad \lambda_L=\frac{2\pi k_BT}{\hbar}, \qquad \tau_P=\frac{\hbar}{k_BT}.$$ The claim is not that the three-dimensional de Sitter bulk is literally a strange metal. The sharper claim is: $$\boxed{\text{The de Sitter stretched horizon belongs to the same transport universality class as a Planckian strange metal.}}$$ The correspondence applies to the horizon membrane, not to bulk spacetime. Membrane Paradigm and the KSS Value In the membrane paradigm, an event horizon behaves for exterior observers as a stretched viscous membrane with transport coefficients fixed by Einstein gravity. This does not require an assumed AdS/CFT dual. For de Sitter, $$\ell_\Lambda=\frac{c}{H}, \qquad T_{dS...
Post a Comment
Read more

Our cosmic event horizon on a string

A Cosmic Stringy Adventure ! As we previously discussed, our spacetime characterised by a positive cosmological constant $\Lambda$. The natural bounds are then a minimal  ultraviolet (UV) length $l_{UV} = 2L_P$ and an infrared (IR) cosmological horizon $l_{\Lambda}$.  This dual-boundary spacetime enforces a fundamental Compton–gravitational duality . Every geometric scale $r$ carries two natural mass definitions: $$m_C(r) = \frac{\hbar}{rc}, \qquad m_G(r) = \frac{c^2}{4G}\ r$$ The product of these masses, $m_C \ m_G = M_P^2/4$, is scale-independent. They intersect exclusively at the UV boundary $r = l_{UV}$, defining a maximal local force in GR: $F_{max} = c^4 / 4G$. At the opposite extreme, the Compton mass evaluated at the IR horizon yields the fundamental  spectral gap  (not a particle) of the universe: $m_s = \hbar / (l_{\Lambda} c)$.  In this post, to explore how energy propagates through this dual-scale geometry, we model the mass gap $m_s$ as a null-ener...
Post a Comment
Read more