How running gravity, anomaly-driven vacuum energy, and quantum error correction combine to explain cosmic tensions, while preserving ΛCDM ΛCDM fits the CMB, large-scale structure, and nucleosynthesis exceptionally well. And yet: The locally measured Hubble constant ($H_0$) is higher than the Planck CMB prediction Weak lensing surveys find lower clustering amplitude ($S_8$) than ΛCDM predicts These are small but persistent discrepancies. Rather than discarding ΛCDM, what if these tensions are subtle signals about how vacuum energy and gravity behave dynamically? 1. Core Idea: Mildly Running Gravity Standard ΛCDM Vacuum energy is constant: $$\rho_\Lambda = \text{const.}$$ ARG 3.3: Running Gravity with Anomaly Source In Anomalous Running Gravity (ARG 3.3) , we promote vacuum energy and Newton's constant to dynamic quantities sourced by the trace anomaly of quantum fields and a Gauss–Bonnet term: $$S \supset \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \frac{b}{(4\pi)^2}\ln\left(\frac...
An easy-to-read journey spanning 100+ years of geometric algebra, quantum mechanics and relativity, right up to some of the biggest questions (and solutions) of present-day physics. Many giant shoulders stood upon.