Skip to main content

The Thermodynamic Uncertainty Relation for Spacetime

This theorem proposes a fundamental equation of state for the de Sitter vacuum, linking its thermodynamic energy directly to its quantum-gravitational uncertainty.


Let the de Sitter cosmological horizon be described by:

1. Its thermodynamic energy \(E_{\text{th}}\), the unique energy that satisfies the first law of thermodynamics, \(dE_{\text{th}} = T\,dS\).

2. Its intrinsic quantum position uncertainty (or "fuzziness"), \(\Delta x\), arising from quantum gravitational effects.

The rate of change of the thermodynamic energy with respect to the area of this quantum uncertainty, \(A_{\text{unc}} = \Delta x^2\), is a universal constant equal to the Planck pressure, \(P_{\text{Pl}}\). Mathematically:

$$\frac{dE_{\text{th}}}{d(\Delta x^2)} = \frac{\hbar c^7}{G^2} \equiv P_{\text{Pl}}$$
 

Derivation

The theorem is derived by combining three principles:

1. Thermodynamic Energy: The Brown-York energy is the correct thermodynamic potential, given as a function of the de Sitter radius \(l_\Lambda\):

$$E_{\text{th}}(l_\Lambda) = \frac{c^4 l_\Lambda}{G}$$

2. Quantum Uncertainty: The horizon's position uncertainty, derived from both quantum oscillator and diffusion analogies, yielding:

$$\Delta x^2(l_\Lambda) = L_P l_\Lambda = \frac{G\hbar}{c^3} l_\Lambda$$

3. Differential Calculus: We can now find the rate of change of \(E_{\text{th}}\) with respect to \(\Delta x^2\) using the chain rule, with \(l_\Lambda\) as the common parameter. First, we compute the individual derivatives with respect to \(l_\Lambda\):

$$\frac{dE_{\text{th}}}{dl_\Lambda} = \frac{d}{dl_\Lambda}\left(\frac{c^4 l_\Lambda}{G}\right) = \frac{c^4}{G}$$

$$\frac{d(\Delta x^2)}{dl_\Lambda} = \frac{d}{dl_\Lambda}\left(\frac{G\hbar l_\Lambda}{c^3}\right) = \frac{G\hbar}{c^3}$$

4. Final Step: We compute the ratio of the derivatives. The parameter \(l_\Lambda\) cancels out, revealing a universal constant composed only of fundamental constants:

$$\frac{dE_{\text{th}}}{d(\Delta x^2)} = \frac{dE_{\text{th}}/dl_\Lambda}{d(\Delta x^2)/dl_\Lambda} = \frac{c^4/G}{G\hbar/c^3} = \frac{c^4}{G} \cdot \frac{c^3}{G\hbar} = \frac{\hbar c^7}{G^2}$$

This constant is precisely the Planck pressure, the Planck force \((c^4/G)\) acting over a Planck area \((L_P^2 = G\hbar/c^3)\). This completes the proof.
 

Physical Interpretation  

This theorem provides a new insight into the nature of vacuum energy.
 

Spacetime as a Quantum Elastic Medium:  The relation can be integrated to give \(E_{\text{th}} = P_{\text{Pl}}\,\Delta x^2 + \text{constant}\). This is formally identical to the potential energy of a simple harmonic oscillator, \(E = \frac{1}{2}kx^2\). It suggests that the thermodynamic energy of the vacuum is the stored potential energy due to its own quantum-gravitational displacement or "fuzziness." The "spring constant" of spacetime is the Planck pressure.
 

A New Equation of State for the Vacuum:  This is a new type of equation of state, not relating pressure and density, but relating total energy to quantum uncertainty. It implies that a universe with a "fuzzy" horizon must necessarily contain thermodynamic energy. This provides a physical reason for the existence of vacuum energy—it is the thermodynamic consequence required by the horizon's quantum nature.
 

Connection to the "Factor of Two":  The theorem can be rewritten using the geometric energy \(E_g = E_{\text{th}}/2\). Since \(E_{\text{th}} = P_{\text{Pl}}\,\Delta x^2\) (absorbing the constant), it follows that:

$$E_g = \frac{1}{2}P_{\text{Pl}}\,\Delta x^2$$

This provides a physical picture for the duality: the total potential energy stored in the quantum fuzziness is \(E_{\text{th}}\), but the energy accessible to the geometry (the Misner-Sharp energy) is only half of that, analogous to the virial theorem for a harmonic oscillator where the average potential energy is half the total energy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blurring the horizon - the quantum width of the cosmic event horizon

A 2021 paper by Zurek applied a random walk argument to a black hole horizon.   Credit, Zurek, 2021 Zurek called this a blurring of the horizon (a fuzzy, or uncertain horizon), and also went through some equivalent derivations, which basically supported the idea this length scale is the quantum uncertainty in the position of the BH horizon, aka a dynamic quantum width of an event horizon (a concept which would therefore also apply to the universe's own CEH). The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy gives the number of quantum degrees of freedom that can fluctuate. Below, we step out our own cosmic de-Sitter derivation of the random walk argument, obtaining the same result as Zurek did, so its certainly correct! \begin{equation} \Delta x^2 =2 DT \end{equation} In this equation, $\Delta x$ is the position uncertainty, $D$ is the Einstein diffusion coefficient and $T$ is the time between measurements (aka the relaxation time).    So, lets look at the Einstein diffusion co...
Post a Comment
Read more

Remarks on the cosmological constant and minimal acceleration

As Lineweaver explained, because our Universe is expanding at an accelerating rate, our Universe has a cosmic event horizon (CEH).    Its an event horizon Jim, but not as we know it...Image credit: DALL.E2 by SR Anderson Events beyond the CEH will never be observed. The CEH is also the source of de Sitter radiation, which has a specific temperature $T_{dS}$. It is the minimum possible temperature of the Universe, and, it is not absolute zero (zero Kelvins). Numerically $T_{dS} \approx 2.4 \times 10^{-30}K$, the universal minimum (black body) `absolute cold' local temperature of the future dS state. As a comparison, in 2020 the NASA Cold Atom lab was able to cool an atom to a record low $\sim 2 \times 10^{-7}K$.  Now, in any theory one may think of temperature as an energy, and from the semi-classical Unruh relationship, temperature $\sim$ acceleration. Therefore:   \begin{equation} \notag E_{dS} = T_{ds} \ k_B= \frac {\hslash a}{2\pi c} \end{equation} What we g...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dark photons and the Universal ground-state energy

 In a previous post we introduced the idea that our current Universe has boundary conditions.    Classical 1+1 dS space-time visualized as basketball hoop, with the up/down slam-dunk direction being the time dimension, and the hoop circumference the space dimension.    We also showed a diagram similar to Figure 1 below. Except here, we are once again thinking about the future dS state . Figure 1 . For an observer at O inside the cosmic event horizon (CEH) with radius $l_{\Lambda}$, the universe can be divided into two sub-vacuums, $(A)$ inside the CEH, and $(B)$, outside. The horizon surface $\Sigma$ has entanglement entropy $S_{dS}$ and rest energy $E_H$   Figure 2. The maximum entropy of the Universe (credit: Lineweaver ).   Now, a comoving volume partition of the Universe can be treated as a closed system for which $dS \geq0$. The maximum entropy of a closed system, in this case  ( Figure 2 ) with $L=2 \pi l_{\Lambda}$, the circum...
Post a Comment
Read more